Microsoft 365 模型对比信息图

Using the provided reference image as a benchmark for a clean, readable business infographic style, create a 16:9 comparison slide that demonstrates how different image generation models render an infographic about {argument name="topic" default="Microsoft 365"}. Replace the Japanese DX report content with four separate sample infographic outputs arranged in a 2×2 grid on a white background. Layout: Use exactly 4 panels, each showing a different Microsoft 365 ecosystem diagram, with a small horizontal orange model label near the left side of that panel. The four labels must be: 1) {argument name="top left model label" default="GPT-Image-2"}, 2) {argument name="top right model label" default="GPT-Image-1.5"}, 3) {argument name="bottom left model label" default="MAI Image 2 Efficient"}, and 4) {argument name="bottom right model label" default="Flux.2 Flex"}. Panel content: Each panel should visualize Microsoft 365 at the center with surrounding app icons and labels. Include recognizable Microsoft-style app tiles/icons such as Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, OneDrive, SharePoint, OneNote, Forms, Planner, Loop, and Copilot where appropriate. Make the top-left panel the most polished and text-readable, with a circular hub-and-spoke diagram and concise app descriptions. Make the top-right panel simpler, with icons connected to a central Microsoft 365 box. Make the bottom-left panel look like a structured category chart with Productivity, Collaboration, and Storage sections. Make the bottom-right panel look like a softer radial diagram with category headings and some imperfect or slightly inconsistent labels to imply model comparison. Style: Clean corporate SaaS infographic aesthetic, lots of white space, thin gray connector lines, Microsoft-like blue/green/orange/purple icon colors, crisp readable English text. Preserve the reference image’s practical business-document feel, but do not recreate its Japanese government-report layout, red warning sections, arrows, or original text. Constraints: Show exactly four model comparison examples, no extra title banner, no watermark, no Japanese text, and keep all text legible enough to compare model performance.

以提供的参考图像为基准，采用简洁、易读的商业信息图风格，创建一个 16:9 的对比 Slides，展示不同图像生成模型如何渲染关于 {argument name="topic" default="Microsoft 365"} 的信息图。将原有的日本 DX 报告内容替换为四个独立的示例信息图输出，并以 2×2 的网格形式排列在白色背景上。 布局：使用 4 个面板，每个面板展示不同的 Microsoft 365 生态系统图，并在面板左侧附近放置一个小的水平橙色模型标签。四个标签必须为：1) {argument name="top left model label" default="GPT-Image-2"}，2) {argument name="top right model label" default="GPT-Image-1.5"}，3) {argument name="bottom left model label" default="MAI Image 2 Efficient"}，以及 4) {argument name="bottom right model label" default="Flux.2 Flex"}。 面板内容：每个面板应以 Microsoft 365 为中心，周围环绕应用程序图标和标签。在适当位置包含可识别的 Microsoft 风格应用磁贴/图标，例如 Word、Excel、PowerPoint、Outlook、Teams、OneDrive、SharePoint、OneNote、Forms、Planner、Loop 和 Copilot。左上角面板应最为精致且文字清晰，采用圆形中心辐射图和简洁的应用描述。右上角面板应更简洁，图标连接至中央的 Microsoft 365 方框。左下角面板应呈现为结构化的类别图表，包含生产力、协作和存储部分。右下角面板应呈现为较柔和的径向图，带有类别标题，并包含一些不完美或略有不一致的标签，以体现模型对比效果。 风格：简洁的 SaaS 企业信息图美学，留白充足，细灰色连接线，Microsoft 风格的蓝/绿/橙/紫色图标，清晰易读的英文文本。保留参考图像的实用商业文档质感，但不要重现其日本政府报告的布局、红色警告部分、箭头或原始文本。 约束：仅展示四个模型对比示例，不含额外的标题横幅，无水印，无日文文本，并确保所有文本清晰度足以对比模型性能。